How economists were wrong about the Great Recession

Oct 25
In general, economists are unable to predict when an economic downturn will occur; nevertheless, if there were accurate indicators, a downturn would happen right away as market players would adjust their plans in anticipation of the impending bad times. In this regard, our capacity for prediction is limited.

This, however, is not a flaw in any one economic theory in particular. Instead, economics as a whole has discovered that expectations are crucial in a way that makes business cycles challenging to forecast.
While a recession could still happen if inflation drops from 9% to 2-4%, there isn't much evidence that it will. This expectation was made by some economists using aggregate demand models.

Another set of economists contended that genuine credibility was necessary for inflation-reduction initiatives to work. Market players will increase prices at a slower rate and postpone mass layoffs if they feel the central bank will maintain its current trajectory.

The fact that economists cannot agree on, and possibly do not know, which model is accurate is a legitimate criticism of macroeconomics. Nevertheless, whether deflation turns out to be credible or not, there is a foundation for assessing this problem. Perhaps the only way to know the answer is to see actual history as it happens.

In general, macroeconomics improves our ability to formulate better questions and comprehend the outcomes when they happen, and even if it cannot fully account for the inherent unpredictability of human history, it offers a better and more perceptive viewpoint than those who completely disregard economics and macroeconomics.

The Great Recession of 2007–2009 is one instance that is frequently used as oppositional testimony against economists. In this regard, economists have erred.
Many experts claimed there was a real estate bubble when real estate prices started to slow down and eventually started to collapse. The idea soon spread that the real estate bubble burst caused a sharp drop in aggregate demand, which was followed by a decline in employment and output.

The evidence for today suggests that these prices are prophetic, albeit a little early. Recent changes in real estate valuation seem to support the market's unexpected realization that many real estate assets will be worth far more in the future.

Economists ought to be slower to determine what constitutes a bubble and what does not. In the short term, the housing bubble theory has held up, but economists ought to have had less confidence in their abilities to forecast the market.

The good news is that we can put together what happened by looking back. Monetary policy, the shadow banking system, and real estate panics are all topics where policymakers and market participants have repeatedly erred.

Created with